# Siteimprove Alternative: Accessibility Scanning Without an Enterprise Platform

Source: https://accessibilityscore.in/siteimprove-alternative
Last reviewed: 2026-10-16 by the HalfAccessible accessibility team

Siteimprove is an enterprise platform that covers accessibility, search, analytics and content governance. AccessibilityScore.in does one job: scan pages and sites for accessibility issues, with transparent self-serve pricing. This page compares them so you can decide which fits your team.

## Short answer
Siteimprove.ai is an enterprise digital governance platform with accessibility monitoring across websites, documents and apps, sold through demos and quotes. AccessibilityScore.in is a self-serve accessibility scanner: one public page free, whole-site scans of up to 250 pages at $10 for 1,000 page credits, with exports and scheduled re-scans.

## Key facts

- **Siteimprove platform areas:** Accessibility, search, analytics and content strategy
- **Siteimprove accessibility scope:** Monitoring across web, documents, social, apps and PDFs, according to its product page
- **Siteimprove engine:** Alfa, an open-source engine built on the W3C ACT Rules Format
- **Siteimprove buying process:** Request a demo; pricing is not listed on its accessibility page
- **AccessibilityScore.in engine:** axe-core plus custom rules
- **AccessibilityScore.in pricing:** One page free; $10 for 1,000 page scan credits, no limit on websites

## What does Siteimprove offer?

Siteimprove, now branded Siteimprove.ai, sells a platform that brings accessibility together with SEO, analytics and content quality. Its accessibility product focuses on continuous monitoring and governance across an organisation's whole digital estate, including documents and PDFs, with policies and reporting for large teams.

Its accessibility checks run on Alfa, an open-source, standards-based engine that implements rules in the W3C Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Rules Format. It is sold through demos and quotes rather than a public price list.

## When is Siteimprove the better choice?

Siteimprove is likely the better fit if you:

- Manage many large sites and need governance, policies and roles across departments
- Want accessibility, SEO, analytics and content quality in one contract
- Need monitoring of PDFs and documents at scale
- Need sign-in, integrations or coverage that a public-page scanner does not provide
- Have budget and time for an enterprise procurement and onboarding process

## When is AccessibilityScore.in the better choice?

AccessibilityScore.in is likely the better fit if you:

- Want to start scanning today without a sales call, a contract or a minimum term
- Need accessibility only, not a full marketing platform
- Want predictable cost: one page scan credit per page, $10 for 1,000
- Look after several smaller sites, since credits work across any number of websites
- Want a clear score, WCAG-mapped findings, CSV and PDF exports, and daily, weekly or monthly re-scans
- Value seeing uncertain checks as Needs review rather than having them dropped

## What do both tools have in common?

Both automate the WCAG checks that can be decided from code, and both are only a first layer. Neither can confirm WCAG conformance on its own: meaningful alt text, keyboard task flows, screen reader announcements and understandable errors still need manual testing by people. Whichever tool you choose, pair it with manual audits of your key user journeys.

## Siteimprove vs AccessibilityScore.in

| Feature | Siteimprove.ai | AccessibilityScore.in |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Focus | Enterprise platform: accessibility, search, analytics, content | Accessibility scanning and reporting |
| Rule engine | Alfa (open source, W3C ACT rules) | axe-core (open source) plus custom rules |
| Documents and PDFs | Monitored, according to its product page | Not scanned; web pages only |
| Pages behind a login | Check with Siteimprove | No; public HTTPS pages only |
| Site size per scan | Enterprise scale | Up to 250 pages per site scan |
| Scheduled re-scans | Continuous monitoring | Daily, weekly or monthly |
| Getting started | Request a demo | Paste a URL; sign up for site scans |
| Pricing | Not published on its accessibility page | One page free; $10 for 1,000 page credits |

## Common questions

### What is a cheaper alternative to Siteimprove for accessibility?
If you only need accessibility scanning, AccessibilityScore.in is self-serve: one page is free and whole-site scans cost $10 for 1,000 page credits, with no contract.

### What engine does Siteimprove use for accessibility?
Alfa, Siteimprove's open-source, standards-based accessibility conformance testing engine, which implements rules in the W3C ACT Rules Format.

### Does AccessibilityScore.in check PDFs like Siteimprove?
No. It scans public web pages. If document and PDF monitoring at scale is essential, an enterprise platform such as Siteimprove may fit better.

### Why would results differ between Siteimprove and AccessibilityScore.in?
They use different engines, Alfa and axe-core, which implement and count rules differently. Compare specific issues rather than overall scores.

### Can I switch from Siteimprove to AccessibilityScore.in?
You can start scanning your public pages at any time without a contract. Check what you rely on in Siteimprove, such as PDF monitoring or SEO, before you cancel.

### Does either tool make my site compliant?
No. Both find automatable issues. Compliance with WCAG, the ADA or the EAA depends on fixing issues and manual testing of what tools cannot judge.

## Sources

1. [Siteimprove: Accessibility product page](https://www.siteimprove.com/platform/accessibility/)
2. [Siteimprove Alfa on GitHub](https://github.com/Siteimprove/alfa)
3. [W3C WAI: Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) overview](https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/act/)
4. [axe-core on GitHub](https://github.com/dequelabs/axe-core)

Run a free accessibility score: https://accessibilityscore.in